🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."